<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net neutrality campaigners have got it wrong..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.m-i-x.com/net-neutrality-campaigners-have-got-it-wrong/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.m-i-x.com/net-neutrality-campaigners-have-got-it-wrong</link>
	<description>Marketing, Technology, PR, Innovation &#38; cool</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:25:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hermes</title>
		<link>http://www.m-i-x.com/net-neutrality-campaigners-have-got-it-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Hermes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m-i-x.com/?p=31#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Spot on - the wailers and moaners want their cake and to eat it too.  If the BBC aren&#039;t going to pay for increased traffic caused by the iPlayer who is?  It&#039;s not as if the ISPs are charities after all.

In the end the consumer will directly fork out the cost if content deals for traffic prioritisation don&#039;t pick up the slack, and much as the wailers would tell you the huge majority of consumers would quite happily have them subsidise their connection if the choice was an extra £5 per month on top of their broadband subscription.

H</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on &#8211; the wailers and moaners want their cake and to eat it too.  If the BBC aren&#8217;t going to pay for increased traffic caused by the iPlayer who is?  It&#8217;s not as if the ISPs are charities after all.</p>
<p>In the end the consumer will directly fork out the cost if content deals for traffic prioritisation don&#8217;t pick up the slack, and much as the wailers would tell you the huge majority of consumers would quite happily have them subsidise their connection if the choice was an extra £5 per month on top of their broadband subscription.</p>
<p>H</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business &#187; Net neutrality campaigners have got it wrong..</title>
		<link>http://www.m-i-x.com/net-neutrality-campaigners-have-got-it-wrong/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Business &#187; Net neutrality campaigners have got it wrong..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.m-i-x.com/?p=31#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] Matt wrote an interesting post today on Net neutrality campaigners have got it wrong..Here&#8217;s a quick excerptA totally unfounded fear that campaigners have is that web hosting companies are going to go out of business - Web hosting companies are already paying for bandwidth, and their costs are just passed to their clients - It’s not their &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Matt wrote an interesting post today on Net neutrality campaigners have got it wrong..Here&#8217;s a quick excerptA totally unfounded fear that campaigners have is that web hosting companies are going to go out of business &#8211; Web hosting companies are already paying for bandwidth, and their costs are just passed to their clients &#8211; It’s not their &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

